The cities do the arguing
The firm was founded in 2020 and competes with consultancies a century old. Its pitch is that those incumbents are outdated, selling expensive slide decks delivered by junior associates. There was no back catalogue to point at yet, and a conventional site would have contradicted that pitch on the first screen. The second brand talks to real estate investors rather than corporate buyers, so it had to read as related without reading as the same company.
Four full-bleed aerial films of Atlanta, Moscow, Tel Aviv and Mexico City, counted 01/04 with each city and the role it plays. Evidence, for a firm too new to have case studies
A fixed black rail down the left edge carries the wordmark vertically, so the frame stays constant while the film changes
Digital Insights as one grid of everything the firm publishes (video, PDF, service offering, news), each tile tagged by type
Mergence Capital built on snapped full-screen sections, so a dense investment prospectus is paged through
The same system runs across both: serif display, full-bleed imagery, near-zero chrome. Ground and accent separate them. Yellow on black film for the consultancy, orange over daylight for the capital arm
Capital's funding pages flip to a light ground with drawn property icons, so the deal criteria read as a document
Two sub-brands absorbed without new sites: Mergence Global Sourcing under Global, and a bilingual Hebrew and Latin lockup for Capital








A firm with no back catalogue still opens on evidence: four cities it actually works in, shown as film
The firm's own argument against slide-deck consulting is not contradicted by its website
Two audiences that share an owner but nothing else get their own front door, without either brand looking borrowed
One tagged grid means a video, a whitepaper and a press item publish through the same template